Introduction
Bladder trauma is a relatively uncommon presentation, with a variation in its incidence across various age groups. In adults, an estimated 65–86% of bladder injury is as a result of blunt trauma. In contrast, penetrating trauma accounts for 14–35% of bladder injuries in adults [1] . The incidence of iatrogenic bladder injury ranges from 0.04% to 58%, depending on the type of procedure [2] . The o
Bladder trauma is a relatively uncommon presentation, with a variation in its incidence across various age groups. In adults, an estimated 65–86% of bladder injury is as a result of blunt trauma. In contrast, penetrating trauma accounts for 14–35% of bladder injuries in adults [1]. The incidence of iatrogenic bladder injury ranges from 0.04% to 58%, depending on the type of procedure [2]. The overall incidence of bladder injury in children following abdominopelvic trauma is higher than the adult population as the bladder is less well protected [3].
The most widely recognised practical classification of bladder injury relates to the site of injury, i.e., intraperitoneal, extraperitoneal, or both. This plays a key role in guiding patient management [4]. In contrast, the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) classification of bladder injuries is based on the size and site of injury (Table 1) [5]. However, this classification has not been adopted by any of the other guidelines included in this review.
Table 1. The AAST classification of bladder injuries
| Grade | Injury |
| 1 | Contusion, intramural haematoma, or partial thickness laceration |
| 2 | Extraperitoneal bladder wall laceration <2 cm |
| 3 | Extraperitoneal >2 cm or intraperitoneal <2 cm bladder wall laceration |
| 4 | Intraperitoneal bladder wall laceration >2 cm |
| 5 | Intra- or extraperitoneal bladder wall laceration involving the trigone or bladder neck |
Bladder Trauma: A Guideline of the Guidelines; Reddy D, Laher AE, Moeng M, Adam A_6; BJU International published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of BJU International. 2024; 133(3):365–374. doi:10.1111/bju.16236._2024