neobookRx
GuidelinesOther guideline

Patient Assessment

Appropriate selection of children for sedation is the first step to safe sedation practice. It is generally accepted that adults, through their lived experience, have the necessary coping skills to ensure safe and successful sedation. However, children of different age groups, and even children within the same age group, have different coping skills. The procedure to be performed will largel

Appropriate selection of children for sedation is the first step to safe sedation practice. It is generally accepted that adults, through their lived experience, have the necessary coping skills to ensure safe and successful sedation. However, children of different age groups, and even children within the same age group, have different coping skills. The procedure to be performed will largely determine what level of coping skills is required of the child. Every child must therefore specifically be assessed to determine their suitability for sedation outside of a hospital operating room.

Unfortunately, most SPs only meet the child on the day of the procedure. The operator has the privilege of evaluating the child during the first consultation. Therefore, the SP should assist and guide the operator in evaluating the child’s suitability specifically for sedation. It may be helpful to provide some guidance in the form of printed or written notes to assist the operator in this process. Inappropriate patient selection is a recurring factor in sedation-related adverse events and poor outcomes.

It is recommended that, if at all possible, the SP should meet the child some time before the sedation to determine the child’s cooperation capabilities and build rapport with the child. The presedation visit should also be used to obtain information concerning the child, as well as providing information to the parent/caregiver. It is recommended that the information should be in the form of written notes for the parent/caregiver to refer back to as necessary.

If it is not practical to meet the child in person, it is advised that the parent/caregiver is contacted in advance of the sedation appointment to obtain and share information as set out above. The information should prepare the parent/caregiver and child for what to expect during the sedation, thereby facilitating communication and alleviating anxiety. This may be followed up with a phone call to the parent/caregiver to address any questions directly.

Whenever possible, previous records (i.e. medical, sedation, anaesthesia and surgical history) should be retrieved and examined.

The presence or absence of the parent/caregiver during the procedure needs to be discussed as well.

The evaluation of the child should include the following:

  • A recent medical history questionnaire (Appendix 4: Medical History Questionnaire). Details of previous sedations are vital, as previous failed attempts at sedation may indicate the need for GA for future procedures. Enquire about previous problems with airway management as part of the suitability check for out-of-hospital procedures.
  • The drug history of the child, with special attention to:
    • chronic medication (e.g. asthmatic treatment, steroids and antihistamines for allergies, isotretinoin (Roaccutane), anti-diabetic drugs),
    • psychotropic drugs (e.g. anti-epileptics),
    • stimulants (e.g. methylphenidate), or
    • recreational drugs in teenagers, especially since the relaxation of legislation on the use of marijuana.
  • An airway assessment – various airway evaluation scales are available to assist the SP with evaluating the airway, e.g. the Lemon Law8 and Mallampati9 classifications (Appendix 5: Evaluation of the airway for sedation). The Lemon Law aids the SP in identifying factors for a difficult airway.
    During an airway assessment:
    • Observe from the front and side looking for particularly syndromic features (e.g. lowpositioned or abnormal ears and pre-auricular tags)
    • Hypoplastic or receding chin
    • Upper jaw overbite
    • Loose teeth
    • Enlarged tongue
    • Enlarged tonsils (approaching the midline or associated with snoring)
    • Flexion and extension of the neck
    • Hoarseness
    • Wheezing

An active upper respiratory tract infection (URTI) is a current or recent URTI, where two or more of the following symptoms or signs are still present:

  • rhinorrhoea
  • sore or scratchy throat
  • sneezing
  • nasal congestion
  • malaise
  • cough
  • fever
  • unexplained tachycardia
  • a parent reports or is concerned that the child is sick

Airways remain reactive for up to six weeks following a URTI and reactive airways are prone to laryngospasm during PSA. Sedation is probably best avoided during this period.

An assessment must also include:

  • an evaluation of the cardiovascular and respiratory systems by way of auscultation of the heart and lungs, and
  • an enquiry about previous abnormal laboratory tests.

Where indicated, a paediatrician should be consulted about the condition of the child. If the child was seen at an earlier appointment, a re-evaluation of the health status immediately before sedation and surgery is recommended.

Assessment should be done in accordance with the ASA physical status classification system10,11(Table II). However, while anaesthesia and sedation providers use the ASA classification to indicate a child’s overall preoperative status for anaesthesia and sedation, it may be misinterpreted as a classification to predict risk. It is important to realise that this is not a risk classification, but an evaluation of clinical status only.

Table II: American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification system modified10,11

Class I A normal healthy patient, no functional limitations
Class II A patient with a history of well-controlled mild systemic disease (e.g. diabetes mellitus, hypertension), no substantial functional limitations
Fragile ASA II patient A patient not controlled on morning or afternoon of procedure (i.e. hypertensive, diabetic, asthmatic, obstructive sleep apnoea)
Class III A patient with severe systemic disease that limits activity, but is not incapacitating
Class IV A patient with severe systemic disease that is a constant threat to life
Class V A moribund patient not expected to survive 24 hours with or without an operation
Class VI Clinically deceased patients
“E” An emergency procedure is denoted by the letter E following the class number

ASA-E – Emergency operation for any of the above classes (e.g. ASA II-E)

Only children in ASA Class I, II and fragile ASA II well-controlled, should be considered for sedation outside of a hospital operating theatre. It is possible for the ASA status to deteriorate from the time the child was initially evaluated to the time of the sedation (e.g. ASA II patients may become ASA III patients by the time of the procedure). Therefore, the recommendation is that children should be evaluated again immediately prior to the procedure.

Children in ASA Class III, IV or V require higher levels of monitoring and care. It is advised that procedures for these patients be done in-hospital.

Certain children are at increased risk for complications and it is imperative that these patients be recognised as such, during the preoperative assessment either in person, through the medical questionnaire or by telephonic consultation. Strong consideration should be given to sedating these children in a hospital setting and should be determined on an individual basis. Other factors may play a role (e.g. the extent and duration of the procedure, manner of transport and level of care at home).

Children at an increased risk for complications include, but is not limited to:

  • Children younger than 3 years of age.
  • Children with a history of prematurity with residual pulmonary, cardiovascular, gastrointestinal or neurological problems, or significant anaemia.
  • Children with congenital syndromes.
  • Children with obesity (> 95th percentile body mass index (BMI) for their age).
    *The association between obesity and obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) limits the use of sedatives and opioids and increases risk in light of early discharge requirements. Children with restrictive lung disease are prone to desaturation – they must be evaluated on a case-by-case basis.
  • Children with previous failed sedation.
  • Children with any known adverse reactions (hyperactive or paradoxical response) or allergy to any of the sedation drugs.
  • Children who display severe behavioural problems or hyperactivity, or who are mentally challenged.
  • Children whose parents are reluctant.

Click here for the pdf


SASA Paediatric Guidelines for the Safe use of Procedural Sedation and Analgesia for Diagnostic and Therapeutic Procedures in Children: 2021–2026

Drugs mentioned

NeoHealth® ID 19026 · updated 5/21/2024